翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Publique Sportive Mouara ・ Publish and Be Damned ・ Publish and Subscribe (Mac OS) ・ Publish or perish ・ Publish What You Fund ・ Publish What You Pay ・ Publish2 ・ Published Price to Dealer ・ Published work on cinema by Denis Gifford ・ Publisher (disambiguation) ・ Publisher Item Identifier ・ Public Use Microdata Area ・ Public Utilities Board ・ Public utilities commission ・ Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ・ Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak ・ Public utilities in Colombia ・ Public utilities of Mymensingh ・ Public utility ・ Public Utility Building, Bangalore ・ Public Utility Commission of Texas ・ Public utility district ・ Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 ・ Public utility model ・ Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act ・ Public value ・ Public Vault at the Congressional Cemetery ・ Public viewing area ・ Public Warning ・ Public Warning System (Singapore) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak ： ウィキペディア英語版 Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak ''Public Utility Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak'', 343 U.S. 451 (1952),〔''(Public Util. Comm'n of D.C. v. Pollak )'', 343 U.S. 451 (1952). (Full text of the decision courtesy of FindLaw.)〕 is a United States Supreme Court decision which held that the playing of radio programs on street cars and busses of a transit system regulated by the government as a public utility did not violate the First or Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. ==Background== The Capital Transit Company was a privately owned public utility that operated a street car and bus transit system in the District of Columbia. After conducting a rider test, Capital Transit in 1949 installed a system to play radio programs provided under a contract with local radio station WWDC in return for compensation. In July 1949, the Public Utility Commission of the District of Columbia (now the D.C. Public Service Commission), which regulates public utilities within D.C., opened an investigation to determine whether the playing of the radio programs was "consistent with the public convenience, comfort, and safety." Pollak and Martin, who were two protesting Capital Transit customers, intervened in the administrative proceeding. After several hearings, the Public Utilities Commission determined that the playing of radio programming was not inconsistent with public convenience, comfort, and safety. Pollak and Martin appealed the Commission decision to the U.S. District Court for D.C., which dismissed the case. Pollak and Martin then appealed to the Court of Appeals for D.C., which reversed and gave instructions for the district court to vacate the Commission decision. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari for consideration of case given its novelty and its importance to the public.〔343 U.S. at 458.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.